Guest mrjones Posted January 26, 2005 Posted January 26, 2005 I've decided to pursue a professional designation, and am trying to decide which is the more useful: QKA (Qualified 401k Administrator, by ASPPA) or RPA (Retirement Plans Associate, by same people who do CEBS). I'm currently involved with DC employee/participant education (nearly all 401k), and would like to move into relationship management. Any thoughts on which of the above, or any other designation, would be most valuable in both preparing me for a relationship management role and in giving me credibility in a job search?
Ron Snyder Posted January 27, 2005 Posted January 27, 2005 What about APA from NIPA? (NIPA) Or QPA from ASPPA? [Note: These are not "professional designations", but para-professional (or quasi-professional) designations labeled as professional designations.]
GBurns Posted January 27, 2005 Posted January 27, 2005 What and who determines what is a professional designation? George D. Burns Cost Reduction Strategies Burns and Associates, Inc www.costreductionstrategies.com(under construction) www.employeebenefitsstrategies.com(under construction)
Lori Friedman Posted January 27, 2005 Posted January 27, 2005 Some years back, I completed the exams for the APA (Accredited Pension Administrator) credential offered by NIPA (National Institute of Pension Administrators). The program was extremely comprehensive and thorough (not to mention grueling, having to study for and pass 6 exams). Lori Friedman
GBurns Posted January 27, 2005 Posted January 27, 2005 Do you or your peers regard it as a professional designation? George D. Burns Cost Reduction Strategies Burns and Associates, Inc www.costreductionstrategies.com(under construction) www.employeebenefitsstrategies.com(under construction)
david rigby Posted January 27, 2005 Posted January 27, 2005 Here is one prior discussion thread: http://benefitslink.com/boards/index.php?showtopic=20870 There may be others. I'm a retirement actuary. Nothing about my comments is intended or should be construed as investment, tax, legal or accounting advice. Occasionally, but not all the time, it might be reasonable to interpret my comments as actuarial or consulting advice.
AndyH Posted January 27, 2005 Posted January 27, 2005 GBurns, what designations do you have? What licenses? Should mrjones get one of them?
GBurns Posted January 27, 2005 Posted January 27, 2005 What does it matter to mrjones? I do not do nor do I plan to do pension administration or anything that he plans to do. I have all I need for what I do, the people that I represent, and those that I represent them before. George D. Burns Cost Reduction Strategies Burns and Associates, Inc www.costreductionstrategies.com(under construction) www.employeebenefitsstrategies.com(under construction)
FundeK Posted January 27, 2005 Posted January 27, 2005 I think GBurns question Do you or your peers regard it as a professional designation? is a relevant one.I think it is important to take a look at those around you (city, company) and see what they regard as a "professional designation". This is the one you want to pursue if you plan to stay in your current position and city. This designation would give you the "credibility in a job search" that you are looking for. As for "preparing you for a role in relationship management", I don't know that any professional designation will do that. That most likely takes time and experience. I, for one, went the ASPPA route simply because that is the only one my company supported and promoted. I do think I learned alot from the courses, but have learned ALOT more in doing my job day to day. The course give you a foundational knowledge, but if you aren't applying it, you will lose that knowledge fast.
Guest Forms R Us Posted January 27, 2005 Posted January 27, 2005 If you have so much confidence in your complete lack of professional licenses, credentials, and designations, why are you so defensive? Me thinks thou doth protest too much.
Guest quinn the car fixer Posted January 27, 2005 Posted January 27, 2005 the CEBS exams are very general and not very applicable in my day to day duties. the ASPA exams are much more helpful (at least for me). I don't know much about NIPA. ASPA designation would be recognized in any city in any region of the US. (b/c i have lived in 4 states around the US )
GBurns Posted January 27, 2005 Posted January 27, 2005 Forms R Us To whom is your post addressed? George D. Burns Cost Reduction Strategies Burns and Associates, Inc www.costreductionstrategies.com(under construction) www.employeebenefitsstrategies.com(under construction)
jquazza Posted January 27, 2005 Posted January 27, 2005 NIPA and ASPPA both offer very comprehensive programs for pension administrator. Each organization recognizes the other and grants credit for certain exams taken with the other, so if you want to pursue both designations, it a plus. As far as being recognized as professional designation vs. para-professional, I don't know what that means. Maybe that you don't have any rights or powers granted to you once you have one of these designations (except for the right to call yourself APA or QPA etc...) I do know that as a hiring manager, I personally value these designations more than a college degree. /JPQ
Guest THess Posted January 28, 2005 Posted January 28, 2005 I have personally went the ASPPA way...but as a Corporate Trainer in the DC Plan field, I have also tutored employee's for the NIPA exams. I think both are definitely recognized, helpful and in some cases required. As a business owner now, I require that all my employees have either the QKA (qualified 401(k) administrator) from ASPPA or APA (accredited pension administrator) designation from NIPA. Now if you want my personal opinion, I think ASPPA is more indepth. NIPA covers about the same, but some of the topics are briefly discussed. As well, ASPPA members are constantly informed on everything going on in the pension world. My sister is a member of NIPA and we compare notes all the time. By the way...she calls me all the time to ask questions...lol.
FJR Posted January 29, 2005 Posted January 29, 2005 GBurns, what is pension administration? You mentioned you do not plan on doing that. I am not sure what you mean by pension administration. By the way, what do you call yourself? I would like to breakdown the definition to your response and debate that.
GBurns Posted January 29, 2005 Posted January 29, 2005 From other posters: "APA (Accredited Pension Administrator) credential offered by NIPA (National Institute of Pension Administrators)" "the QKA (qualified 401(k) administrator) from ASPPA or APA (accredited pension administrator) designation from NIPA" "NIPA and ASPPA both offer very comprehensive programs for pension administrator" Pension administration is what pension administrators do. The term pension administrator seems very well known by many other posters, So why not ask them? The definition is widely known and generally accepted in the industry as indicated by the many designation and credentials. It is not subject to "breakdown" or debate. What does it matter what I do? That is not the topic of discussion, is it? George D. Burns Cost Reduction Strategies Burns and Associates, Inc www.costreductionstrategies.com(under construction) www.employeebenefitsstrategies.com(under construction)
Ron Snyder Posted January 29, 2005 Posted January 29, 2005 A "professional" is required to be licensed as such by a professional licensing board. Physicians, veterinarians, dentists, psychologists, etc. are regulated by the various states. Attorneys are regulated by the state supreme court through the state bar association. Actuaries are regulated through the Joint Board for the Enrollment of Actuaries, pre-empting state regulation (at least with respect to licensing with respect to qualified plan work). Professionals are licensed for their post-graduate professional training. Within most professions there are para-professionals. They typically have designations that indicate their training, but those designations are equivalent to certificate programs that do not require a bachelors degree.
GBurns Posted January 29, 2005 Posted January 29, 2005 Therein lies the problem with definitions. In many states, if not all, some of those who are "required to be licensed as such by a professional licensing board" and who are "are regulated by the various states" or by a Licensing Board range from Real Estate persons (Board of Realtors), Cosmetologists (Board of Cosmetology), Insurance agents, Plumbers, Dietitians, Building Inspectors, Masseuses etc. Most of these even require advanced training but not a bachelor's degree. George D. Burns Cost Reduction Strategies Burns and Associates, Inc www.costreductionstrategies.com(under construction) www.employeebenefitsstrategies.com(under construction)
AndyH Posted January 29, 2005 Posted January 29, 2005 Jerome, apparently you (and I) will need to start taking massage classes if we want to call ourselves professionals.
GBurns Posted January 30, 2005 Posted January 30, 2005 How about showing some of your wisdom one of these days? George D. Burns Cost Reduction Strategies Burns and Associates, Inc www.costreductionstrategies.com(under construction) www.employeebenefitsstrategies.com(under construction)
Guest mrjones Posted January 31, 2005 Posted January 31, 2005 Maybe I should have asked "which professional credential". In any case, I didn't mean to instigate a kerfuffle. Based on the information from here and elsewhere, I've begun ASPPA's QKA certification courses. Thanks for your replies!
Archimage Posted January 31, 2005 Posted January 31, 2005 Yes, but what and who determines what is a professional credential?
AndyH Posted January 31, 2005 Posted January 31, 2005 Is it possible to vote someone off the BenefitsBoard Island ala Survivor? Then I could harpoon em.
Guest mmc Posted January 31, 2005 Posted January 31, 2005 As a manager of a 401(k) recordkeeping department, the senior plan administrator position requires a QKA or QPA designation. When reviewing resumes, we look not only for experience, but also the designation. The ASPPA designation requires personal time and perseverence outside of your job. If an individual demonstrates the dedication and pursuit of knowledge by getting the designation, that differentiates that candidate from one who hasn't pursued a designation. However, I realize a designation isn't everything. I was an administrator for 20 years before I completed the exams for the QPA. However, I realized the necessity for getting the designation.
Guest TAG Posted January 31, 2005 Posted January 31, 2005 Quint, I have already voted via email to Dave - twice. Please feel free to follow. TAG PS - MrJones, ASPPA is a fine choice.
actuarysmith Posted February 7, 2005 Posted February 7, 2005 I checked an online dictionary with the following results- Professional - Engaging in a given activity as a source of livelihood or as a career. Credential - That which entitles one to confidence, credit, or authority. As someone who meets the apparently more stringent definition espoused earlier (i.e. Enrolled Actuary) - I consider those individuals who hold APA & QPA designations to hold professional credentials. As I read through the prior posts I felt like I was standing in the middle of a group of guys comparing the sizes of their wing dingers...........
Lori Friedman Posted February 8, 2005 Posted February 8, 2005 Aw, gee, Andy, I was all ready to apply to Bartenders Academy. Lori Friedman
Guest Forms R Us Posted February 8, 2005 Posted February 8, 2005 GBurns, I'm sure we'd all love to hear exactly what it is that you do, and how frequently your colleagues and clients do bodily harm to you.
AndyH Posted February 8, 2005 Posted February 8, 2005 It would appear that he has been voted off and perhaps harpooned. But I miss him already.
JanetM Posted February 8, 2005 Posted February 8, 2005 I don't. You must have a warped sentimental streak quint. JanetM CPA, MBA
AndyH Posted February 8, 2005 Posted February 8, 2005 Janet, Since the emphasis on "listed transactions" and the decline of fun items such as springing cash value 412(i) plans, each time we lose someone who pushes life insurance as investments for children or college education plans I lose a potential food source. Quite sad.
JanetM Posted February 8, 2005 Posted February 8, 2005 quint, I see your point. There have been times I followed GBurns around the boards honing my antagonistic and hostile skills. JanetM CPA, MBA
Guest Ned Ryerson Posted February 8, 2005 Posted February 8, 2005 I can put you in some whole life, term life, disability with an accidental death and dismemberment plan, whatever you need!
jevd Posted February 8, 2005 Posted February 8, 2005 Ned, How often do you visit Phil?? Just 2/2 or do you live there. Its been our traditon to see you every 2/2. JEVD Making the complex understandable.
AndyH Posted February 8, 2005 Posted February 8, 2005 Janet, I thought I was the only such sad soul. Glad to know I'm not alone (I think). Ned, I'm over 16 so that might actually be a good idea for me, especially in my occupation. But it's that variable life policy on my life that my uncle sold my mom when I was three that gets me mad. Imagine if she had bought Microsoft stock instead? I might have been able to go to college and not be stuck out here in the water!
Guest TAG Posted February 8, 2005 Posted February 8, 2005 As I said before, I voted twice......this time! TAG
Guest Gary Rouse Posted February 8, 2005 Posted February 8, 2005 I'm pretty sure Ned Ryerson is the life insurance salesman in the movie Groundhog Day. I chuckled.
Guest Ned Ryerson Posted February 8, 2005 Posted February 8, 2005 I'm funny how? I mean funny, like I'm a clown? I amuse you? I make you laugh? I'm here to amuse you? What do you mean, funny? Funny how? How am I funny? Oops, wrong movie.
Guest Ntutini Posted February 9, 2005 Posted February 9, 2005 Decide why you want the designation. For Career Growth: In terms of value to others, I suggest doing a job search for your job title or the title you seek (on CareerBuilder, Monster, etc.) including the various professional designations for each search. See which credentials employers seem to value most. For You and You Alone: If the certification is for your own benefit, choose the program that most closely meets your needs.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now