Guest jigpsu100 Posted February 10, 2005 Posted February 10, 2005 In an ongoing profit sharing/401(k) plan, how are forfeitures handled? I understand the different ways to try and locate missing participants, and I understand that if they ever come back it must be reinstated. Aside from those issues, the plan uses forfeited matching contributions to off-set future matching contributions. The plan even provides for accounts of missing participants to be forfeited, but what then. Should they just distribute them pro-rata to all participants? Should they treat the forfeitures the same way as the matching contributions? I just don't know.
jquazza Posted February 11, 2005 Posted February 11, 2005 What does your document say about the forfeitures? /JPQ
Guest Pensions in Paradise Posted February 11, 2005 Posted February 11, 2005 Read your plan document. It should (if it is a good document) indicate what to do with the accounts of missing participants.
Guest jigpsu100 Posted February 11, 2005 Posted February 11, 2005 The plan document says that the accounts of missing participants will be forfeited. It says that Matching and Employer Contributions that are forfeited are used to reduce future Employer Contributions. It makes no reference to forfeited elective deferrals. This is my problem. I appreciate your help.
jquazza Posted February 11, 2005 Posted February 11, 2005 Elective contributions are usually considered employer contributions (except on 5500.) /JPQ
No Name Posted February 11, 2005 Posted February 11, 2005 If you're referring to deferrals, these are never forfeitable.
jquazza Posted February 11, 2005 Posted February 11, 2005 They can be forfeitable if the participant is missing. /JPQ
QDROphile Posted February 11, 2005 Posted February 11, 2005 No Name: Why are they any less forfeitable than vested matching or discretionary contributions?
Lori Friedman Posted February 11, 2005 Posted February 11, 2005 NoName, Reg. Sec. 1.411(a)-4(b)(6). If a benefit is payable but the participant/beneficiary can't be located, the benefit may be forfeited. The forfeiture gets reinstated if the individual later makes a claim. Why am I suddenly thinking about Gilligan, the Skipper, the Professor, and Mary Ann? Lori Friedman
QDROphile Posted February 11, 2005 Posted February 11, 2005 Lori: I think you meant to post the following message: No Name: It is true that elective deferrals must be fully vested, but this discussion relates to the special provisions of Reg. Sec. 1.411(a)-4(b)(6). If a benefit is payable but the participant/beneficiary can't be located, the benefit may be forfeited. The forfeiture gets reinstated if the individual later makes a claim. The discussion of forfeitures and the regulation have nothing to do with the regular vesting rules. The regulation provides for forfeiture of all fully vested amounts, including elective deferrals.
JDuns Posted February 11, 2005 Posted February 11, 2005 I agree with QDROphile and Lori that the forfeiture of lost participant, fully vested account balance (regardless of whether the vested amount is from employee elective deferrals or satisfaction of a service based vesting schedule). The next question is what happens with the forfeited balance. In all cases, the plan document governs. It is my understanding that a profit sharing plan must reallocate "regular forfeitures" that are not used for permitted things (funding other employer contributions, restore forfeitures, etc.) to the remaining participants. It is my understanding that a plan may keep the lost participant forfeitures in a suspense account (not allocated to participants) if the plan draws a distinction (since the plan remains liable for the lost participant benefit when the participant is located).
No Name Posted February 11, 2005 Posted February 11, 2005 All, I'll cop to the fact that accounts of lost participants can be forfeited. I've just never done so. I deal with small plans, but can imagine the nightmares the large plans run into.
AndyH Posted February 14, 2005 Posted February 14, 2005 QDROphile, Would that make you a telepath, Lori's official editor, or just an alternate personality?
Guest welcomehome Posted February 23, 2005 Posted February 23, 2005 How would you track these forfeitures if the old participant ever came back to claim his/her portion? I am assuming it would generate interest as well.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now