Tom Poje Posted February 11, 2005 Posted February 11, 2005 is this one too aggressive or does it fall under the rules? HCE 5 4 NHCE 3 1 Plan passes ADP. now, I shift 1% of NHCE to ACP and arrive at HCE 5 4 NHCE 2 2 plan now passes ACP, but one of the rules for shift is plan must pass ADP afterwards. It doesnt. so can I now treat 1% of HCE as catch up?
jquazza Posted February 11, 2005 Posted February 11, 2005 Tom, I think there was a similar discussion few months back. I think it is too aggressive. The mere fact that you don't have refunds because deferrals can be reclassified as catch-up contributions doesn't make your ADP test pass. You have a failing ADP which is being corrected by a recharacterization of the contributions. /JPQ
austin3515 Posted February 12, 2005 Posted February 12, 2005 IMHO, the definition of too aggressive varies from client to client. Some clients are willing to accept risk tomorrow to leave 1,000's in the Plan. I don't think it's "pre-funding-a-year's-deferrals-to-accellarate-the-deduction" bad. I think you could at least defend yourself IF the IRS questioned it. Don't know if you'd win the argument, but again, some client's may find it's worth the risk. I do agree with what jquazza said, but I also don't think you'd be asking the question if it was that off the wall. Austin Powers, CPA, QPA, ERPA
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now