k man Posted May 19, 2005 Posted May 19, 2005 can an employer exclude employees from plan based on duration of service. for example the employer wants to allow only lawyers with the firm for 5 years to participate in the plan. the eligibility will not be 5 years. just for this class they cant participate unless they have a certain seniority.
mbozek Posted May 19, 2005 Posted May 19, 2005 Plan cannot exclude employees using a clasification that has the effect of an age or service requirement in excess of 410(a)- age 21/ 1 yrs of svc. see reg. 1.410(b)-3(e). Need to find some other classification method to exclude these people, geographic, work group, etc. mjb
k man Posted May 19, 2005 Author Posted May 19, 2005 i think your citation to the regs might be incorrect. i dont see a subpart (e). but does it have the same effect as an age and service. they would be permitted to participate if they were secretarys or paralegals. just lawyers have to be employed for 5 years.
mbozek Posted May 19, 2005 Posted May 19, 2005 Should be 1.410(a)-3(e). See example 1. Reg-3(a) says that the plan cannot require that an employee complete a period of service in excess of 1 year as a condition for participation. mjb
Blinky the 3-eyed Fish Posted May 19, 2005 Posted May 19, 2005 I agree with mbozek. Kman, to your question, they are only ineligible because they aren't there 5 years. Other lawyers there 5 years are eligible. That is a service condition a clearly as can be. "What's in the big salad?" "Big lettuce, big carrots, tomatoes like volleyballs."
four01kman Posted May 19, 2005 Posted May 19, 2005 May be able to do it if all such lawyers are HCE, therefore no discrimination in favor of highly paid Jim Geld
mbozek Posted May 19, 2005 Posted May 19, 2005 410(a) does not have an exception that allows discrimination against HCE in eligibility to participate. It requires participation after age 21 and 1 yr for any one otherwise eligible. mjb
Effen Posted May 20, 2005 Posted May 20, 2005 I have seen law firms exclude "Associates" or "Junior Partners". Maybe bring them in at a much lower level. If they are good lawyers, they should be able to come up with a creative solution. The material provided and the opinions expressed in this post are for general informational purposes only and should not be used or relied upon as the basis for any action or inaction. You should obtain appropriate tax, legal, or other professional advice.
k man Posted May 20, 2005 Author Posted May 20, 2005 we have tons of plans where we exclude based on job classification. this one does not fit into that kind of format.
david rigby Posted May 20, 2005 Posted May 20, 2005 If they are good lawyers, they should be able to come up with a creative solution. Heh heh. Don't you just love giving advice to attorneys. I'm a retirement actuary. Nothing about my comments is intended or should be construed as investment, tax, legal or accounting advice. Occasionally, but not all the time, it might be reasonable to interpret my comments as actuarial or consulting advice.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now