Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

can an employer exclude employees from plan based on duration of service. for example the employer wants to allow only lawyers with the firm for 5 years to participate in the plan. the eligibility will not be 5 years. just for this class they cant participate unless they have a certain seniority.

Posted

Plan cannot exclude employees using a clasification that has the effect of an age or service requirement in excess of 410(a)- age 21/ 1 yrs of svc. see reg. 1.410(b)-3(e). Need to find some other classification method to exclude these people, geographic, work group, etc.

mjb

Posted

i think your citation to the regs might be incorrect. i dont see a subpart (e).

but does it have the same effect as an age and service. they would be permitted to participate if they were secretarys or paralegals. just lawyers have to be employed for 5 years.

Posted

Should be 1.410(a)-3(e). See example 1. Reg-3(a) says that the plan cannot require that an employee complete a period of service in excess of 1 year as a condition for participation.

mjb

Posted

I agree with mbozek.

Kman, to your question, they are only ineligible because they aren't there 5 years. Other lawyers there 5 years are eligible. That is a service condition a clearly as can be.

"What's in the big salad?"

"Big lettuce, big carrots, tomatoes like volleyballs."

Posted

410(a) does not have an exception that allows discrimination against HCE in eligibility to participate. It requires participation after age 21 and 1 yr for any one otherwise eligible.

mjb

Posted

I have seen law firms exclude "Associates" or "Junior Partners". Maybe bring them in at a much lower level.

If they are good lawyers, they should be able to come up with a creative solution.

The material provided and the opinions expressed in this post are for general informational purposes only and should not be used or relied upon as the basis for any action or inaction. You should obtain appropriate tax, legal, or other professional advice.

Posted

we have tons of plans where we exclude based on job classification. this one does not fit into that kind of format.

Posted
If they are good lawyers, they should be able to come up with a creative solution.

Heh heh. Don't you just love giving advice to attorneys.

I'm a retirement actuary. Nothing about my comments is intended or should be construed as investment, tax, legal or accounting advice. Occasionally, but not all the time, it might be reasonable to interpret my comments as actuarial or consulting advice.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use