KJohnson Posted February 23, 2000 Posted February 23, 2000 I don't have the cites handy but I looked into this once before and there are PLRs which state that if a participant is taking minimum required distributions while still employed, this does not prevent any subsequent payment at separation from service from being a lump sum and thus eligible for 10 year averaging if the other requirements for averaging are met. [This message has been edited by Dave Baker (edited 02-23-2000).]
Guest zallmark Posted February 23, 2000 Posted February 23, 2000 A PERSON I KNOW IS PAST 7O 1/2 AND HAS TAKEN 3 REQUIRED DISTRIBUTIONS FROM A KEOGH PLAN. HE NOW WANTS TO WITHDRAW THE ENTIRE remaining BALANCE IN A LUMP SUM. CAN THAT PERSON ELECT 10 YEAR AVERAGING OR DOES PREVIOUS MANDATORY DISTRIBUTIONS DISQUALIFY HIM? THANK YOU.
Guest zallmark Posted February 23, 2000 Posted February 23, 2000 DOES ANYONE HAVE A CITE TO SUPPORT K, JOHNSON'S OPINION?
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now