Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I would think so - it would be an amendment to allow for deferrals from 5 to 100% of pay???

I'm basing my answer on the fact that we use the Corbel prototype and it allows you to choose the following option for salary deferrals:

from ____% to ____%

There may be requirements on notifying those who are not contributing the minimum 5%?

Vicki

Posted

do you think they can kick people out who are not deferring 5%?

(again, I know the logic of this makes no sense at all)

thanks for your thoughts

Posted

rate of deferral is a 'right'.

I suspect two things would happen in such a plan.

ADP test would fail since NHCEs would not defer.

BRF could be deemed to fail effective availability. in light of the fact safe harbor 401k have a basic match at 5% deferrals, I suspect the 5% would be used as a guideline for the 'smell' test. anyone who didn't defer could be deemed as not being able to defer under the effective availability test.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use