Guest terric Posted April 21, 2006 Posted April 21, 2006 401(k) plan - no match just deferrals, implementing a negative election - 3%. Using top 20% and excluding "otherwise excludable" from ADP test. HCE's do not want to limit their deferrals, a match contribution is not an option and neither is a safe harbor 401k plan. Anyone have any suggestions or a different 401k plan design that might work? Thanks.
JanetM Posted April 21, 2006 Posted April 21, 2006 There is no plan design the will allow the HCEs to make high deferrals while NHCEs make low deferrals and pass ADP. They either have give NHCEs a safe harbor contribution or do without. PS it is clients like this that drove me from public accounting in the end. JanetM CPA, MBA
Guest terric Posted April 21, 2006 Posted April 21, 2006 I completely understand - just grasping at straws!
four01kman Posted April 21, 2006 Posted April 21, 2006 Look at a nonqualified plan for the very HCEs only. This would solve some problems, but create others. Jim Geld
Guest Pensions in Paradise Posted April 21, 2006 Posted April 21, 2006 JanetM said it all. But wait, there is one other option. They could fire all the NHCE. See, there's always an alternative.
mschwechter Posted April 28, 2006 Posted April 28, 2006 They don't have to limit their deferrals, they just have to expect a refund
MR Posted April 28, 2006 Posted April 28, 2006 They don't have to limit their deferrals, they just have to expect a refund do the owners have spouses they could put on the payroll? if the plan doesn't have a 1-year wait, they could have spouses earn a minimal amount and defer nothing and still be in the non-excludable test by using the "carve out" rule.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now