Randy Watson Posted May 26, 2006 Posted May 26, 2006 I've read through the Code, Regs etc.. and I believe that a "statutory employee" could also be considered "self employed" and thus sponsor their own plan (other than certain life insurance salesmen). Could someone please confirm whether I am correct and let me know whether there are any special issues related to this odd situation that I should know about? Thanks.
WDIK Posted May 26, 2006 Posted May 26, 2006 Are you referring to what used to be called Keogh plans? ...but then again, What Do I Know?
Randy Watson Posted May 26, 2006 Author Posted May 26, 2006 No, 401(k) plans. What did I write that made you think I was referring to Keogh plans?
WDIK Posted May 26, 2006 Posted May 26, 2006 Keogh plan was the term coined to refer to plans adopted by self-employed individuals. Sole proprietors can adopt 401(k) plans. (I think I understand where you are going now. Can an employee set up his or her own plan? I don't think so, unless they can sponsor the plan as a sole proprietor.) ...but then again, What Do I Know?
Randy Watson Posted May 26, 2006 Author Posted May 26, 2006 Okay. I guess that is my question then....whether someone who is treated as a statutory employee can still be considered a sole proprietor as to the remuneration they receive as a statutory employee and thus sponsor their own 401(k). Based on 3121(d)(3) of the Code, "statutory employees" are only "employees" for purposes of FICA and FUTA withholding (no obligation for the employer to withhold for income tax). They are essentially independent contractors who fall within certain parameters that require the service recipient to withhold FICA and FUTA. If they can also fit into the definition of "self employed" (i.e., have earned income) then I believe they can establish their own plan. What do you think?
saabraa Posted May 27, 2006 Posted May 27, 2006 I agree that statutory employees, other than certain life insuranse salespersons, can sponsor their own plan. I don't immediately know of any glitches.
Nate X Posted June 6, 2006 Posted June 6, 2006 IRS Publication 334 refers to tax reporting for Statutory Employees and Sole Proprietors. In the publication, it says: "You can set up and maintain the following small business retirement plans....Qualified Plans." There's NO exception in the publication that states that this does NOT apply to Statutory Employees.
Belgarath Posted June 7, 2006 Posted June 7, 2006 Also see 401©(2)(A)(iii) which supports your position as well.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now