austin3515 Posted July 13, 2006 Posted July 13, 2006 For a non-audited schedule I, are people attaching a schedule of late deposits in order to demonstrate that the correction has been made? Or are you just filling in line 4a, since the schedule is not required anyway? Austin Powers, CPA, QPA, ERPA
JanetM Posted July 13, 2006 Posted July 13, 2006 IMHO if you add attachments they just get tossed out. Why do something that is not required? JanetM CPA, MBA
austin3515 Posted July 13, 2006 Author Posted July 13, 2006 That's how I felt too... I think a snowball has a better chance in you know where, than a non-barcoded attachment to a schedule I has of being read... Apparently though, Steve Forbes suggested doing just this... Austin Powers, CPA, QPA, ERPA
R. Butler Posted July 14, 2006 Posted July 14, 2006 I've heard it suggested, but I really don't the see the reason for doing it. We do not add any kind of attachment. If there are late deposits we are already telling the IRS that a correction been made on the 5330.
Leopurrd Posted July 14, 2006 Posted July 14, 2006 I haven't had late deposits in a while (knock on wood), but I do remember that when I did, I added a footnote to Schedule I stating that corrections were made in full via 5330. Vicki
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now