Guest DTromb Posted October 27, 2006 Posted October 27, 2006 We have a potential new client that would like to have the following match in their plan: They want to have a tiered match in which there is no match up to 8%. Anything over 8% is matched at 2%. Is there any non-discrimination issue with having no match up to 8%? Other than having to pass ACP of course. We've never been asked for such a match. Anyone have any plans with a similar type of match? Thanks.
Leopurrd Posted October 27, 2006 Posted October 27, 2006 Try this thread and the link to the older thread within it: http://benefitslink.com/boards/index.php?showtopic=33686 Basically you have to ensure you are not discriminating in favor of HCE's, which may be the case in a match contributed only on higher %'s of deferred comp, as in your case.
austin3515 Posted October 27, 2006 Posted October 27, 2006 Good luck passing the ACP test! Austin Powers, CPA, QPA, ERPA
Guest DTromb Posted October 28, 2006 Posted October 28, 2006 ACP is only one of the issues we have with this match formula. We are thinking that whoever proposed this formula may have overlooked the fact that those HCEs with very high salaries may never realize any match, especially if the match is allocated at the end of the year.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now