Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Guest msprice
Posted

I have a participant who took a hardship for the purpose of buying a home. The deal fell through and he would like to return the money to the plan.

I have not found any documentation allowing this. Taxes were withheld from the distribution which would further add to this issue.

My recommendation is to suggest that the participant put the money into an IRA (since it has not been more than 60 days) to avoid the tax consequences on the distribution.

Does anyone have any suggestions?

Posted

Just a thought - increase his salary deferrals (assuming this was a 401(k) Plan) to "offset" the taxable income (but not until after the hardship "suspension" period).

Posted

Does the plan allow for after tax contributions? Participant still out the tax withheld but the money could go back into the plan.

JanetM CPA, MBA

Guest msprice
Posted
What happens if the participant does not cash the hardship distribution check?

Unfortunately, it has.

Guest msprice
Posted
It would be nice if plan administrators would catch on to the idea of delivering funds in escrow so failure to close does not create the problem in the first place.

I agree.

Guest msprice
Posted
Does the plan allow for after tax contributions? Participant still out the tax withheld but the money could go back into the plan.

The plan does not allow for after tax contributions.

Posted

Qdrophile - I'd like to explore your idea of having such funds delivered to escrow to avoid these problems. This is, to me at least, an innovative concept, and I've never seen anything on this subject. But I like the idea as long as it works!

How exactly would this work? If the closing doesn't take place, is there any specific IRS guidance or bulletproof legal principle that would avoid this having to be reported as a distribution, and allowing it to "revert" to the plan? To my non-legal mind, it would seem that it is nevertheless distributed from the plan, even though still held in "trust" for lack of a better term. Please excuse my probably inaccurate terminology, as I'm not familiar with the ins and outs of escrow funds/accounts.

Thanks!

Posted

The escrow puts the plan in a better position to maintain that the funds were not delivered because the condition failed, and therefore there was no distribution. Certainly there is no delivery to the participant. This is based on general legal principles rather some specific authority under section 401.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use