Bird Posted March 9, 2007 Posted March 9, 2007 A distributing plan administrator refuses to make a statement as to whether the plan is intended to be qualified. Does anyone have any thoughts/experience on alternative acceptable documentation - SPD, check stub with "XYZ 401(k) Plan" showing the distributing plan's name - so the recipient plan can "reasonably conclude" that the distributing plan was qualified? Ed Snyder
Below Ground Posted March 9, 2007 Posted March 9, 2007 5500 Lines 8(a) and 8(b) use Code 3C if plan is NOT qualified. Other codes also define the plan, somewhat. 5500 filings can be easily obtained from FreeErisa.com. Just a thought. Having braved the blizzard, I take a moment to contemplate the meaning of life. Should I really be riding in such cold? Why are my goggles covered with a thin layer of ice? Will this effect coverage testing? QPA, QKA
JanetM Posted March 12, 2007 Posted March 12, 2007 Does participant have copy of prior plan SPD? That should answer the question. JanetM CPA, MBA
Belgarath Posted March 12, 2007 Posted March 12, 2007 I like Janet's idea. This should allow the new Plan Administrator to "reasonably conclude" that it is ok. Someone could perhaps point out to the previous PA that IRC 1.401(a)(31)-1 mandates that a plan cannot "substantially impair" a participant's right to elect a direct rollover. Whether this refusal rises to that level I can't say, but it might be enough to sway the PA.
Bird Posted March 13, 2007 Author Posted March 13, 2007 Thanks for the responses. We are trying to get an SPD and/or 5500 filing. Fidelity is involved, apparently as the custodian, and I think the participant is incorrectly trying to get them to provide the documentation. They're being no help whatsoever; of course it's not their job but at the same time that's their MO. Ed Snyder
pmacduff Posted March 14, 2007 Posted March 14, 2007 I thought that the receiving plan/administrator could "reasonably rely on the participant's representation" that the rollover $$ comes from a Qualified Plan? So - is the participant trying to make that determination and not having any luck?
Bird Posted March 15, 2007 Author Posted March 15, 2007 I think that the "reasonably rely" language applies to outgoing rollovers; that is, the distributing plan may reasonably rely on the participant's representation that the rollover is going to a qualified plan or IRA. Ed Snyder
pmacduff Posted March 15, 2007 Posted March 15, 2007 I was looking something else up in Sal's books and I found the attached in the rollover section. Our hard copy edition is old as you can see, but I thought this might be helpful... DOC070315_002.pdf
Guest BXO Posted March 15, 2007 Posted March 15, 2007 Reasonably concluding that an incoming rollover is qualified is in 1.401a31 (and the attachment in the post above) and reasonably relying is allowed when you are making the rollover disbursement (you rely that it is going to a qualified plan or IRA and you don't need to withhold tax.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now