Earl Posted April 21, 2007 Posted April 21, 2007 A payroll company put in a PS/401k plan for a client who had a PS/401k plan with me. They established it as a new plan rather than a restatement. I seem to remember but cannot find that the TP Grp election must be consistent for all plans of the employer. I used the top paid group election. They did not. Since their document is executed later than mine does that effectively amend my doc? (I would just tell the client that the payroll company is now handling the entire thing (the new plan vs restatement treated as a mistake) but they used a standardized PS doc and that will cost the employer thousands of dollars compared to my new comp plan to get the same max allocation to the partners. So I am trying to see if I can do anything to work around all this. Lots of issues to chuckle about...) Thanks CBW
austin3515 Posted April 22, 2007 Posted April 22, 2007 One plan document would never amend another. I think you have a plan document failure. Maybe it's in EPCRS? Definitely you are correct that all must use TPG, of course, because nondiscrim must be run at the employer level for coverage (at a minimum). Austin Powers, CPA, QPA, ERPA
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now