Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

A participant in pay status under a defined benefit plan wants to change his form of benefit. The plan doesn't provide for such a change, but the Administrator has empathy for the guy. My question is could the plan so provide? Although an administrative nightmare, I think yes, but subject to the consent requirements as of the time of original election. In this case, the guy elected J&50%S and was married. Now, divorced and wants LO. What do you folk think?

Posted

You've got to be kidding! Many plans could be amended to permit changes post commencment, but why would you do so? "Empathy" is hardly a reason to put the plan at risk for the second guessing of most retirees.

I'm a retirement actuary. Nothing about my comments is intended or should be construed as investment, tax, legal or accounting advice. Occasionally, but not all the time, it might be reasonable to interpret my comments as actuarial or consulting advice.

Posted

Be careful of opening Pandora's box. How many particpants in pay status might be similarly situated? Has anyone else in pay ever asked for this before and been denied? Rather than repeat it, re-read Pax's last sentence above.

Kurt Vonnegut: 'To be is to do'-Socrates 'To do is to be'-Jean-Paul Sartre 'Do be do be do'-Frank Sinatra

Posted

Has anyone given any thought to how the former spouse/survivor annuitant might have to say about such a change?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use