Guest cac1134 Posted September 10, 2007 Posted September 10, 2007 A participant in pay status under a defined benefit plan wants to change his form of benefit. The plan doesn't provide for such a change, but the Administrator has empathy for the guy. My question is could the plan so provide? Although an administrative nightmare, I think yes, but subject to the consent requirements as of the time of original election. In this case, the guy elected J&50%S and was married. Now, divorced and wants LO. What do you folk think?
david rigby Posted September 10, 2007 Posted September 10, 2007 You've got to be kidding! Many plans could be amended to permit changes post commencment, but why would you do so? "Empathy" is hardly a reason to put the plan at risk for the second guessing of most retirees. I'm a retirement actuary. Nothing about my comments is intended or should be construed as investment, tax, legal or accounting advice. Occasionally, but not all the time, it might be reasonable to interpret my comments as actuarial or consulting advice.
masteff Posted September 10, 2007 Posted September 10, 2007 Be careful of opening Pandora's box. How many particpants in pay status might be similarly situated? Has anyone else in pay ever asked for this before and been denied? Rather than repeat it, re-read Pax's last sentence above. Kurt Vonnegut: 'To be is to do'-Socrates 'To do is to be'-Jean-Paul Sartre 'Do be do be do'-Frank Sinatra
jpod Posted September 10, 2007 Posted September 10, 2007 Has anyone given any thought to how the former spouse/survivor annuitant might have to say about such a change?
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now