fiona1 Posted September 13, 2007 Posted September 13, 2007 Kind of a 2 part question here ---- I know there has been a lot of discussion on this board on how to test employees with no compensation. I think the general consensus is that you would not include them on ADP/ACP because they were not able to defer due to no compensation. What are your thoughts on how you test an employee with no compensation in coverage / Ratio Percentage? They're an active employee who can't be excluded in minimum age/service, bargaining employee, etc. My thoughts are that they'd have to be considered not benefiting on the Ratio Percentage K test. They can't be deemed to benefit because with no compensation, there is no way they'd be able to benefit. Going a step further, what if the employee with no compensation is on military leave. I thought USERRA indicated that they couldn't be considered not benefiting for coverage - but for the life of me I can't find any reference to that. Any thoughts?
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now