Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Yep, and depending on the language for how it was frozen, could even allow new loans to be taken. I've seen this in acquisitions where the acquired plan is frozen and employees are moved to the purchaser's plan.

Kurt Vonnegut: 'To be is to do'-Socrates 'To do is to be'-Jean-Paul Sartre 'Do be do be do'-Frank Sinatra

Posted

I'll go a step further and suggest it woul be imprudent from a fiduciary perspective to disallow loan repayments. This would definitely be a fiduciary no no.

Not to mention the adverse tax consequences on the participants who would receive deemed distributions.

Austin Powers, CPA, QPA, ERPA

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use