Guest ssmith Posted December 10, 2007 Posted December 10, 2007 We have had a participant who lives in her dad's house request a hardship withdrawal because she is behind on her rent owed to her dad. The dad expects his rent money to be paid by the summer and won't allow the participant or her sons to live at his house if the debt is not paid. Has anyone else run into this situation before? Would this situation count as preventing eviction from the participant's principal residence? I think that it would since she will indeed be forced out of her principal residence even though she is renting from her dad, but just wanted to hear some other thoughts. Thanks!
Lori Friedman Posted December 11, 2007 Posted December 11, 2007 Reg. Sec. 1.401(k)-1(d)(3)(iii)(B)(3) allows "Payments necessary to prevent the eviction...from the...principal residence." I can't find any rulings or other guidance that refine or otherwise qualify the regulation. If the plan participant is truly facing a threat of eviction, which seems to be the case, I can't locate any authority that would prevent her from receiving a hardship distribution (to the extent of her immediate and heavy financial need). By the way, her father sounds like a real prince of guy. Lori Friedman
david rigby Posted December 11, 2007 Posted December 11, 2007 ... but the plan administrator should not ignore the possibility of fraud. In the words of Dr. House, "Everybody lies." I'm a retirement actuary. Nothing about my comments is intended or should be construed as investment, tax, legal or accounting advice. Occasionally, but not all the time, it might be reasonable to interpret my comments as actuarial or consulting advice.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now