Gary Posted January 28, 2008 Posted January 28, 2008 There are several types of investments that satisfy the QDIA requirements. However, one investment that would not be a QDIA is if a Plan used a money market account as a permanent (more than 120 days) investment. If we are in agreement with my above comment, then does this mean that using a money market account as a permanent default would not receive liability protection and thus an employee can sue an employer for such a default investment? Thanks.
John Feldt ERPA CPC QPA Posted January 28, 2008 Posted January 28, 2008 I believe so. They would argue that the fiduciary was not prudent in their selection of the investment. I think the difficulty would be to determine the amount that the participant is now able to "recover" if they were to win the suit.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now