J Simmons Posted February 16, 2008 Posted February 16, 2008 I'm advising a multiple employer plan (MEP) in which unrelated ERs participate. One person works for two of these unrelated ERs. As to one such ER she is an HCE by virtue of ownership interest. She is not an owner in the other ER and does not earn enough from that other ER to be an HCE. In testing these two ERs separately, is she considered an HCE for both ERs or just the ER in which she has the ownership interest that renders her an HCE? I'm thinking that she'd be an HCE only with respect to the owner in which she has an ownership interest, as that is consistent with the notion of separate testing in the first place. However, I'm wondering if anyone knows of a rule/ruling where consistency did not win out? John Simmons johnsimmonslaw@gmail.com Note to Readers: For you, I'm a stranger posting on a bulletin board. Posts here should not be given the same weight as personalized advice from a professional who knows or can learn all the facts of your situation.
Below Ground Posted February 17, 2008 Posted February 17, 2008 Since no one else replied, I will say that I agree with your "notion of separate testing" for this purpose. I wish I could give you a cite supporting that position, but as you have probably found, there is very little in the way of clear guidance for issues like this under MEPs. I also note that how you determine key employees is another area that I find to be "grey". Do we have an issue of separate testing here also? Anyway, hope this helps (I suspect not.). Having braved the blizzard, I take a moment to contemplate the meaning of life. Should I really be riding in such cold? Why are my goggles covered with a thin layer of ice? Will this effect coverage testing? QPA, QKA
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now