Guest saotampa Posted May 5, 2008 Posted May 5, 2008 We use the Corbel NS 401(k) document and have a client that wants the deferral contribution limit to be from 3% to 98%. Can we put a limit of 3% as the minimum instead of 1% (plan is not being set up for Auto Enrollment). I don't see anything in the document limiting it, but I want to make sure we can do it by law. Thank you.
Jim Chad Posted May 6, 2008 Posted May 6, 2008 I can't think of any obstacles in laws or regulations. But a practical problem may be FICA and Medicare taxes. Is the employer an exempt organization, like a church? We usually recommend 90% as a maximum because it is easier to work with than 92.35%
Jim Chad Posted May 6, 2008 Posted May 6, 2008 I see that I did not address your main question. Which is can you raise the minimum deferral from 1% to 3%? I can't remember where, but I thought I read that any minimum over 10$ or 1% could be a problem. Does anyone else remember anything like this?
JanetM Posted May 6, 2008 Posted May 6, 2008 I don't know of mandated minimum. I think that your circumstances would be the deciding factor. Will you have problem with top heavy? BRF? ADP? Small plan with only a few NHCEs could end up with the HCE deferral at very low level. JanetM CPA, MBA
masteff Posted May 6, 2008 Posted May 6, 2008 One additional point of information that might be helpful is why 3% specifically.... such as is it the amount that gets full match? I previously worked w/ a very large plan that used 3% as a minimum for pre-tax contributions; 3% was the amount which resulted in full match. So I can state that under that fact and circumstance, the IRS and DOL had no problem w/ it. Kurt Vonnegut: 'To be is to do'-Socrates 'To do is to be'-Jean-Paul Sartre 'Do be do be do'-Frank Sinatra
Guest saotampa Posted May 6, 2008 Posted May 6, 2008 Thanks for the responses. I don't know specifics of this client and I'm waiting to hear from the broker as to why they are limiting deferrals anyway. They have over 100 employees and I had to do BRF testing because they were interested in a step match formula based on years of service. Match is discretionary though most projections I ran for them had a match % with a limit up to 3% of comp.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now