Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

The IRS model language for public school 403(b) plans includes an option for automatic enrollment for new employees. But won't they run into state wage withholding issues? Preemption of conflicting state regulation was added to ERISA section 514. But because the public school is a governmental employer, it is not subject to ERISA.

Posted

The IRS language speaks only to what the IRS would recognize concerning 26 U.S.C. 403(b). Further, the IRS expressly stated that some of that language states provisions that might be improper under non-tax law.

For a non-ERISA 403(b) plan of a public-schools employer, an implied-election provision is in many States unlawful, and in some would, if followed, result in a crime.

A public-schools employer should get expert advice about States' laws.

Peter Gulia PC

Fiduciary Guidance Counsel

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

215-732-1552

Peter@FiduciaryGuidanceCounsel.com

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use