Janice F Posted April 1, 2009 Posted April 1, 2009 If a series of substantially equal periodic payments are taken, then distributee avoids the 10% early distribution penalty. In researching this (trying to assist a client who may be subject to the 10% penalty that he already took in 2008), I found that there are 3 ways to calculate the distributable amount. My question is whether that amount can be exceeded? For example, if I use the RMD method and that results in a figure of $10,000, can the distributee actually take out $20,000 per year as long as he/she maintains that level for at least 5 years or age 59 1/2? p.s. Happy April Fool's Day to all my fellow pension fools.
J Simmons Posted April 1, 2009 Posted April 1, 2009 If a series of substantially equal periodic payments are taken, then distributee avoids the 10% early distribution penalty. In researching this (trying to assist a client who may be subject to the 10% penalty that he already took in 2008), I found that there are 3 ways to calculate the distributable amount. My question is whether that amount can be exceeded? For example, if I use the RMD method and that results in a figure of $10,000, can the distributee actually take out $20,000 per year as long as he/she maintains that level for at least 5 years or age 59 1/2?p.s. Happy April Fool's Day to all my fellow pension fools. I don't think so. IRC sec 72(t)(2)(A)(iv) excepts from the 10% early penalty tax "part of a series of substantially equal periodic payments (not less frequently than annually) made for the life (or life expectancy) of the employee or the joint lives (or joint life expectancies) of such employee and his designated beneficiary". If that would be a $10,000 payment per year over life expectancy, a $20,000 would undercut that. At $20,000 per year, that would run out in 1/2 of the person's life expectancy. John Simmons johnsimmonslaw@gmail.com Note to Readers: For you, I'm a stranger posting on a bulletin board. Posts here should not be given the same weight as personalized advice from a professional who knows or can learn all the facts of your situation.
masteff Posted April 1, 2009 Posted April 1, 2009 Looking at Rev Rul 2002-62, you should be looking at either the fixed amortization method or fixed amortization annualization method, not the MRD method. The trick is to see if you can arrive at your $20K number using acceptible factors. I can't speak to the overall content of the site but the website www.72t.net has a calculator you might use and see how far off you are. Kurt Vonnegut: 'To be is to do'-Socrates 'To do is to be'-Jean-Paul Sartre 'Do be do be do'-Frank Sinatra
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now