richard Posted May 22, 1999 Posted May 22, 1999 For the purpose of the 25% of compensation 415 limit, do you define compensation by starting with the employee's pay and subtracting the 401(k) employee deferrals as well as the Section 125 plan deferrals. For example, an employee earns $100,000. He defers $10,000 into the 401(k) and another $5,000 into the Section 125 plan. Is his 415 limit equal to 25% of $100,000, $95,000, $90,000 or $85,000. (Please ignore the issue if his pay is above $160,000) Thanks
Guest David Dye Posted May 22, 1999 Posted May 22, 1999 For the 25% limit under Sect. 415, you do not exclude amounts deferred under a salary reduction arrangement. To use your example, you would take 25% of $100,000 for the 415 limit. The definition of compensation under IRC Sect. 415©(3) was amended by the Small Business Job Protection Act of 1996, effective for Plan Years beginning on or after January 1, 1997.
richard Posted May 23, 1999 Author Posted May 23, 1999 David, that's what I thought. I think the code reference is 415©(3)(D), but I believe it's effective for plan years beginning after 12/31/97.
Guest David Dye Posted May 24, 1999 Posted May 24, 1999 You are correct on the effective date of the 415 definition of compensation. It IS effective for plan years beginning after 1997. I stand corrected. [This message has been edited by David Dye (edited 05-24-99).]
Guest JD Colville Posted May 24, 1999 Posted May 24, 1999 As a slight aside to this question, I had understood that the IRC 404 limit was not changed to correspond to the change in the 415 limit which was amended for plan years beginning after 1997 as you correctly point out. However, in a recent IRS audit, the examiner took the position that the 404 limit for profit sharing plans included the deferrals to 401(k) and to 125 plans for plan years beginning after 1997. I was also surprised to find that the IRS support for its definition of compensation for IRC 404 purposes is a Private Letter Ruling, (PLR) 9225038, which is based on regulations which were last amended in 1961. Has anyone dealt with this issue? JDC
Guest bswift Posted May 27, 1999 Posted May 27, 1999 yahoo, nope see Treas. Reg. Sec. 1.415-2(d)(3)(i).
Guest yahoo Posted May 27, 1999 Posted May 27, 1999 For the 25% of the 415 calculation, may you also include deferrals under a nonqualified deferred compensation plan?
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now