Guest andmik Posted July 1, 2009 Posted July 1, 2009 An employer has two plans. Neither is exclusively a union plan. One covers employees out in the field and the other is for office employees. The plan that covers field employees is a safe harbor matching plan. The office plan is not a safe harbor plan and has a discretionary match and profit sharing plan. The office plan has most, if not all the HCEs in it, but nonetheless, the field plan has a couple of HCEs. Other than passing coverage testing separately, does anyone see a prohibition against this sponsor providing for a safe harbor arrangement in one plan and testing the other under ADP/ACP rules? Thanks in advance for any feedback.
Guest Sieve Posted July 1, 2009 Posted July 1, 2009 You can use your approach as long as each plan passes 410(b) coverage testing standing alone. (There is no universal availability rule for a SH plan.)
Jim Chad Posted July 3, 2009 Posted July 3, 2009 I am quite certain there is no sort of "universal availability " rule for SH. So I think you have it right.
Jim Chad Posted July 3, 2009 Posted July 3, 2009 I would have sworn I pressed the send key yesterday. ya gotta love computers.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now