Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

May amounts "transferred" from another plan on a nonelective basis, as distinct from "rollovers," be excluded when determining whether an account does not exceed the $5,000 limit for mandatory cashouts under 411(a)(11)?

Posted

Putting transferred in quotes may or may not be significant. Perhaps you can provide some more details?

I'm a retirement actuary. Nothing about my comments is intended or should be construed as investment, tax, legal or accounting advice. Occasionally, but not all the time, it might be reasonable to interpret my comments as actuarial or consulting advice.

Posted
Putting transferred in quotes may or may not be significant. Perhaps you can provide some more details?

Thank you, David. A nonelective transfer that occurs where a plan is merged into another following a stock acquisition, for example. I understand that a transfer from one qualified plan to another that occurs where an employee changes employers is considered a "rollover contribution" and therefore may be disregarded when calculating the $5,000 threshold. (Please correct me if you believe otherwise.) But I don't think that a nonelective transfer is treated as a rollover contribution and therefore must be considered when determining eligibility for mandatory cashouts.

  • 5 months later...
Guest Salvador A Mander
Posted
Putting transferred in quotes may or may not be significant. Perhaps you can provide some more details?

Thank you, David. A nonelective transfer that occurs where a plan is merged into another following a stock acquisition, for example. I understand that a transfer from one qualified plan to another that occurs where an employee changes employers is considered a "rollover contribution" and therefore may be disregarded when calculating the $5,000 threshold. (Please correct me if you believe otherwise.) But I don't think that a nonelective transfer is treated as a rollover contribution and therefore must be considered when determining eligibility for mandatory cashouts.

I believe that a "transfer" that does not result from any participant direction (i.e., plan #1 is terminated with assets automatically transferred to plan #2, or plan #1 merged into #2), then the transferred balances may not be disregarded for purposes of the involuntary cashout limit. But if a participant affirmatively elects to have his account transferred to Plan #2, that's treated as a rollover and can therefore be disregarded for 411(a)(11).

I am interested to hear other opinions.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use