justatester Posted December 18, 2009 Posted December 18, 2009 We have a client that requires BRF Testing. Here is a breakdown of the formulas: 50% to 4% (A) 50% to 5% (B) 75% to 6% © 100 % of 1, plus 50% on 2&3, Plus 25% on 4&5 (D) For my testing groups breakdowns: Test 1: Group A, B, C Test 2: Group B, C Test 3: Group C Test 4: Group D Is this correct?
MWeddell Posted December 18, 2009 Posted December 18, 2009 Your way is permissible. Other permissible methods (in my opinion -- the regulations are quite sparse on these details): Test 1: Group A Test 2: Group B Test 3: Group C Test 4: Group D Test 1: All matching formulas at least as favorable as A, which is Groups A, B, C, and D Test 2: All matching formulas at least as favorable as B, which is Groups B, C, and D Test 3: All matching formulas at least as favorable as C, which is Group C only Test 4: All matching formulas at least as favorable as D, which is Group D only
justatester Posted December 18, 2009 Author Posted December 18, 2009 When breaking down the groups, are you looking at the overall total match received vs the actual formula? For example, the 50% to 5% (2.5% total) vs the 100% on 1%, 50% on 2&3, and 25% on 4&5 (2.5% total): If a person defers 1% they are getting different levels one being 100% the other being 50%. Can you test them in one group as equal formulas? Or since the participant has the availability to receive the match at a total of 2.5% make them "equal"?
MWeddell Posted December 18, 2009 Posted December 18, 2009 I'm not sure I can explain my thinking in writing any better, but I'll try. You can test all of the different matching formulas separately, which is the first method I indicated. Alternatively, you can test each match formula that is at least as favorable as the A formula, at least as favorable as the B formula, at least as favorable as the C formula, and at least as favorable as the D formula. When I consider which formula is at least as favorable as B, then I include the employees eligible for the D formula because regardless of how much they contribute, D is >= B. I agree that the two formulas are not equal because if an eligible employee contributes more than 0% but less than 5%, D is better than B, which is why test 4 is still required on Group D alone.
Jim Chad Posted December 18, 2009 Posted December 18, 2009 Just want to clarify.....are you talking about coverage testing, ACP test or both?
MWeddell Posted December 18, 2009 Posted December 18, 2009 We're talking about benefits, rights or features testing under Treas. Reg. 1.401(a)(4)-4. Presumably there is one "plan" (in the 410(b) sense of the term) that includes 4 matching formulas.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now