Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Can allocation groups in a new comp plan be defined by name? For example: Group 1 = specific owner, Group 2 = specific owner, Group 4 = all other participants?

Thanks

Posted

But, keep in mind that if you define groups by name, the plan must pass 410(b) using the ratio percentage test. One part of the average benefit test requires that the plan pass the nondiscriminatory classification test of 1.410(b)-4, which includes a reasonable classification requirement.

1.410(b)-4(b) Reasonable classification established by the employer. --A classification is established by the employer in accordance with this paragraph (b) if and only if, based on all the facts and circumstances, the classification is reasonable and is established under objective business criteria that identify the category of employees who benefit under the plan. Reasonable classifications generally include specified job categories, nature of compensation (i.e., salaried or hourly), geographic location, and similar bona fide business criteria. An enumeration of employees by name or other specific criteria having substantially the same effect as an enumeration by name is not considered a reasonable classification.
Posted

As solution, you may wish to delineate between owners by ownership, or service, or something (not age) that is different. If needed, you can always make each person their own group.

Having braved the blizzard, I take a moment to contemplate the meaning of life. Should I really be riding in such cold? Why are my goggles covered with a thin layer of ice? Will this effect coverage testing?

QPA, QKA

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use