Guest LmD Posted January 20, 2010 Posted January 20, 2010 When you are performing the adp/acp testing required once Safe Harbor Match is removed mid year, do you test on full year compensation or do you have to pro-rate the compensation to the point of supsension of the SH Match? The concern I heard is that someone (owners)would front end their contributions prior to the suspension in order to receive the maximum benefit.
austin3515 Posted January 20, 2010 Posted January 20, 2010 The test is run for the full year. The entire year is a non-safe harbor plan year, even though the match was provided for part of the year. Austin Powers, CPA, QPA, ERPA
Guest LmD Posted January 20, 2010 Posted January 20, 2010 I sat in on a Webcast yesterday and the speaker discussed proposed regs and not forgetting to pro-rate the salary. He went further to say that ASPPA challenged this at a hearing on 9/23. This was the first I had heard of this and was concerned that we were performing our tests incorrectly by not pro-rating the compensation. Any thoughts?
rcline46 Posted January 20, 2010 Posted January 20, 2010 In the proposed regs for removing the non-elective SH, the pro-rating was to the cessation date and the calculation of the 3% non-elective.
justatester Posted January 20, 2010 Posted January 20, 2010 What if it is a safe harbor match that was contributed for 6 months? Do you only use the compensation from those 6 months or can you use full year compensation for the ACP test?
rcline46 Posted January 21, 2010 Posted January 21, 2010 You test ALL deferrals and ALL match contributions for the year against ALL compensation for the year. It is as if the Safe Harbor did not exist.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now