Guest Quacka Posted March 31, 2010 Posted March 31, 2010 Ok, from the regs. and treatises I have read, if a 401(k) plan sponsor is using the W-2 safe harbor definition of plan compensation, then non-qualified stock option (NQSO) exercise income is included in plan compenation (and would also be included under the 3401(a) wages for withholding safe harbor definition). The adoption agreement I have has a check-the-box to exclude NQSO grant income, but not exercise income. So should plan sponsors using the W-2 definition indeed include the NQSO exercise income in plan comp? How do they take elective deferrals from this non-cash income? This does not make intuitive sense. And...correction methods if they are improperly excluding the income? Thanks!
Guest Quacka Posted April 7, 2010 Posted April 7, 2010 Update (1) We concluded that our plan excludes all income from stock-based compensation (either at grant, vesting, or exercise). (2) We concluded that our plan compensation falls outside the W-2 safe harbor for this reason, and therefore requires compensation nondiscrimination testing. At a high-level, we concluded that the compensation is nondiscriminatory since 95% of our stock-based compensation participants are HCEs, which would serve to drive down the HCE compensation ratio relative to NHCEs.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now