Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Why do termianting plans have to restate for EGTRRA? If they have a vaild GUST doc and all of the pretinent amendments, I don't see why they would have to do a full restatement--I would think they are already operating under the proper rules & regs.

Any idea why the IRS wants these restated? Is it a money thing; do they want the Determination Letter fees?

QKA, QPA, CPC, ERPA

Two wrongs don't make a right, but three rights make a left.

Posted

DC plan I assume.

If the date of termination is today or earlier, then they only need to adopt all current law to update the plan to terminate.

Restating from GUST to EGTRRA, if using a pre-approved document, would provide IRS reliance for the EGTRA, post EGTRRA, 401(a)(9), 401(a)(31)(B), and Final 401(k)/401(m) regulations amendments. Meaning, the IRS can't pick those apart for review if you restated for EGTRRA. That would only leave the Final 415 Regs amendment, the PPA amendment, the WRERA Amendment, the HEART amendment, and Notice 2010-15 amendment that they can pick apart upon review (if they audit the plan).

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use