austin3515 Posted May 20, 2010 Posted May 20, 2010 We took over a plan, and here's what they do (and have been doing for several years, and allegedly passed audits): -Each employee gets $500 to spend on health insurance benefits, -If people opt out, or if they have lower insurance premiums, the $500 (or the remainder of the $500) is deposited to their account as profit sharing. We're thinking no CODA b/c the employee never has the option to receive it. Let's assume they were on a volume submitter document, each in their own group, and therefore no restrictions on the number of allocation groups. My biggest problem with this is that it seems to fail the requirement that a plan have a definitely determinable allocation method, since the allocation includes these other varaibles (i.e., the insruance premiums and the amount of this stipend). Do you think a favorable determination letter would ever be granted for a document that includes this allocation method specfically? Austin Powers, CPA, QPA, ERPA
Mike Preston Posted May 20, 2010 Posted May 20, 2010 I don't see the concern. If it were treated as deferrals, it would be a problem, based on the contingent benefit rules, unless it were part of a 125 plan. But for profit sharing? I know of no restrictions.
Below Ground Posted May 21, 2010 Posted May 21, 2010 Each person is their own rate group? Having braved the blizzard, I take a moment to contemplate the meaning of life. Should I really be riding in such cold? Why are my goggles covered with a thin layer of ice? Will this effect coverage testing? QPA, QKA
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now