justatester Posted June 8, 2010 Posted June 8, 2010 We have a very complex controlled group set of plans. One of the members does not pass coverage....They now want to be aggregated with one of the other members....We ran the 2008 Test in a timely fashion and it passes. They now want to rerun the 2008 test including this other plan. If we do this, can we apply the "statutory minimum" disaggregation rules still? If we do the test will pass. If we don't, it will not. In addition, they can only want to do this for the ADP test and not the ACP test. The plans have different testing methods (CY vs PY) for ADP and ACP. (which of course is a silly plan design because it limits the types of plan aggregation)...So Can your "covered" group be different for pretax vs match vs profit sharing? Any thoughts greatly appreciated.
Tom Poje Posted June 8, 2010 Posted June 8, 2010 there is no requirement that coverage/nondiscrim for ADP, ACP and nonelective be done on the same basis. think of each of these items being a seperate 'plan'. however, one you sart looking at each 'plan', the testing has to be the same -you can not aggregate prior year test with a current year test, etc
justatester Posted June 8, 2010 Author Posted June 8, 2010 Ok...what about applying the Statutory minimums (disaggregation) beyond 12 months after the plan year ends?
Tom Poje Posted June 10, 2010 Posted June 10, 2010 same deal. each 'plan' is separate. what is consistent is that what you do for coverage is the same as you do for nondiscrim. and you wouldn't otherwise exclude ADP and not ACP and then try to 'shift' contributions
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now