Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

When running testing using net comp, if the owner has K-1 income of say $250,000 AFTER all employer/payroll tax deductions, are other people reducing the comp by the $16,500 in deferrals to test consistently?

I'm not sure there is any basis for doing it this way, it just seems like the right thing to do...

Austin Powers, CPA, QPA, ERPA

Posted

Since the 401(k) deferrals have no bearing to arrive at the gross figure (net earned income), if testing on net compensation you should exclude it. The formulas to arrive at net earned income are designed to equal that figure with compensation in a corporation. Excluding it too arrives at that equality.

"What's in the big salad?"

"Big lettuce, big carrots, tomatoes like volleyballs."

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use