austin3515 Posted June 11, 2010 Posted June 11, 2010 When running testing using net comp, if the owner has K-1 income of say $250,000 AFTER all employer/payroll tax deductions, are other people reducing the comp by the $16,500 in deferrals to test consistently? I'm not sure there is any basis for doing it this way, it just seems like the right thing to do... Austin Powers, CPA, QPA, ERPA
Blinky the 3-eyed Fish Posted June 11, 2010 Posted June 11, 2010 Since the 401(k) deferrals have no bearing to arrive at the gross figure (net earned income), if testing on net compensation you should exclude it. The formulas to arrive at net earned income are designed to equal that figure with compensation in a corporation. Excluding it too arrives at that equality. "What's in the big salad?" "Big lettuce, big carrots, tomatoes like volleyballs."
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now