RayJJohnsonJr Posted March 10, 2011 Posted March 10, 2011 OK, why can't you do this? A young business owner makes max comp $245,00, deferred the max, $16,500, has 10 employees, who deferred between 5% and 12% of pay, and the plan used the Safe Harbor match($1 per $1 to 3% and 50 cents per $1 to 5% of pay). So, if the plan allows an end of year discretionary match, why doesn't the employer decide to match deferrals greater than 5% of pay up to 7% of pay (since the SHM matched up to 5% of pay) with a $5.24 per dollar match. That way the business owner gets $49,000 total ($16,500 def, $9,800 shm and $22,700 non-vested match). The cost to the employer is that 2 employees contributed more than 5% of pay and wind up getting $8,786 total.
rcline46 Posted March 10, 2011 Posted March 10, 2011 b,r,f problem on level of match, addl match not a SH and must pass ACP tests, double failure.
QNPG Posted March 10, 2011 Posted March 10, 2011 OK, why can't you do this? A young business owner makes max comp $245,00, deferred the max, $16,500, has 10 employees, who deferred between 5% and 12% of pay, and the plan used the Safe Harbor match($1 per $1 to 3% and 50 cents per $1 to 5% of pay). So, if the plan allows an end of year discretionary match, why doesn't the employer decide to match deferrals greater than 5% of pay up to 7% of pay (since the SHM matched up to 5% of pay) with a $5.24 per dollar match. That way the business owner gets $49,000 total ($16,500 def, $9,800 shm and $22,700 non-vested match). The cost to the employer is that 2 employees contributed more than 5% of pay and wind up getting $8,786 total. Please see 1.401(m)-3, particularly section (d). You would fail to satisfy the requirements of 401(m)(11) with formula written above causing at least ACP testing. (not to mention a BRF test) "Great thoughts reduced to practice become great acts." William Hazlitt CPC, QPA, QKA, ERPA, APA
RayJJohnsonJr Posted March 10, 2011 Author Posted March 10, 2011 Thanks y'all. OK, what's a BRF? Is there any additional match that could be made without causing problems
QNPG Posted March 10, 2011 Posted March 10, 2011 Thanks y'all.OK, what's a BRF? Is there any additional match that could be made without causing problems Benefit, right or feature. The additional match is listed in that Tres. Reg that I quoted previously. You could so long as you do not match deferrals in excess of 6% of comp and match itself does not exceed 4% of compensation. "Great thoughts reduced to practice become great acts." William Hazlitt CPC, QPA, QKA, ERPA, APA
Lou S. Posted March 10, 2011 Posted March 10, 2011 Thanks y'all.OK, what's a BRF? Is there any additional match that could be made without causing problems Benefit, right or feature. The additional match is listed in that Tres. Reg that I quoted previously. You could so long as you do not match deferrals in excess of 6% of comp and match itself does not exceed 4% of compensation... ...and does not increase as the rate of match increases. The design in the OP pretty much fails outright on numerous levels.
RayJJohnsonJr Posted March 10, 2011 Author Posted March 10, 2011 Thanks everybody, I see I'm barking up the wrong tree.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now