imchipbrown Posted April 4, 2000 Posted April 4, 2000 I have a client that is switching investment vehicles. Previously, he had a pooled account with six or eight mutual funds, mostly no-load. Because of the time needed to administer the plan, they're switching to an insurance company product for investments, statements, etc. The Trustee's only concern is that the employees will be absorbing an "invisible" charge at the switch. Basically, their account balances get invested in mutual funds at a slighly inflated share price. Anyway, the Employer is amenable to making up roughly half the hidden charge. It'll be about $10,000, so the employer wants to allocate $5,000 on an account balance basis. I've seen some cases where IRS has allowed additional contributions to true-up a fiduciary breech and the like. Is this do-able? I'm fairly sure that highly comp'ed employees have larger account balances, but also may be smaller in proportion to pay.
Jon Chambers Posted April 7, 2000 Posted April 7, 2000 I've worked with some insurance companies that are willing to bill the incremental wrap fee. This permits participants to get the funds at true NAV. Perhaps your insurance company would be willing to bill half the fee, acheiving the objective without requiring an extra allocation. Worth asking anyway. ------------------ Jon C. Chambers Principal Schultz Collins Lawson Chambers, Inc. (415) 291-3004 Jon C. Chambers Schultz Collins Lawson Chambers, Inc. Investment Consultants
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now