Jump to content

Partial Plan Termination


Guest elang

Recommended Posts

Guest elang

Plan has partial Plan Termination in 12/2010. All affected participants become 100% vested. Question I had was whether or not a participant that was terminated in 2006 but still has an account balance needs to be become 100% vested?

Thanks

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Only affected participants become 100% vested. It is unlikely that a terminee from 2006 was part of the affected group or affected by this partial termination. Employees who left voluntarily in 2010 might or might not be considered as 100% vested, depending on the circumstances.

Anyone who stayed around, of course, they would not be 100% vested. (perhaps that is ironic?)

edited: typo

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Personally, we don't 100% vested terms upon plan termination ...

First: significant difference between a "partial plan termination" and a "plan termination". To which do you refer?

Second: depends who is "we". It's not up to the TPA to make the decision.

I'm a retirement actuary. Nothing about my comments is intended or should be construed as investment, tax, legal or accounting advice. Occasionally, but not all the time, it might be reasonable to interpret my comments as actuarial or consulting advice.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...