mming Posted December 8, 2011 Posted December 8, 2011 A >5% owner attains age 70 1/2 on 12/28/11, so it appears that the RBD for his RMD will be 4/1/12. His advisor, however, insists that there's an exception for participants who are born in the latter half of June, i.e., he wouldn't be considered attaining 70 1/2 until 2012, and therefore his RBD isn't until 2013. We were not able to find such a provision after looking through both IRC 401(a)(9) and Treas. Reg. 1.401(a)(9)-2. The Treas. Reg. even had the example of someone who was born on 6/30/33 having an RBD on 4/1/04. The advisor's belief seems unfounded - has anybody ever heard of such an exception?
Bird Posted December 9, 2011 Posted December 9, 2011 That's a shame (that you did any research on this). Nutty stuff like this, you need to ask the person making the claim to provide the cite. Ed Snyder
Tom Poje Posted December 9, 2011 Posted December 9, 2011 I'd ask them if 1.401(a)(9)-2 Q-3 has changed. ...if an employee's DOB is June 30, 1933 the 70th anniverasry is June 30,2003. Such employee turns 70 1/2 on December 30,2003...RBD is April 1, 2004. (I need a new copy if it has changed)
masteff Posted December 9, 2011 Posted December 9, 2011 One thing similar that comes to mind is in the half-month convention in depreciation accounting which says an asset is placed in service only if it's on or before the 15th of the month. Perhaps he's just crossed a wire? Kurt Vonnegut: 'To be is to do'-Socrates 'To do is to be'-Jean-Paul Sartre 'Do be do be do'-Frank Sinatra
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now