Guest JMH1962 Posted February 13, 2012 Posted February 13, 2012 Is there any code reference for this "rule" besides break in service and rule of parity? For example, if a participant is eligible for a plan and later becomes part of excludable class – can the participant be forced to stop deferrals? Thanks in advance.
austin3515 Posted February 13, 2012 Posted February 13, 2012 If a participant is part of an excluded class, than by definition they are not eligible to participate in the plan, so yes their deferrals would stop. The fact that they satisfied eligiblity means the plan must be able to pass coverage treating them as not benefitting. Most plans use the rule of parity. If yours does than to look for a rule other than the rule of parity that talks about recognizing past service is frankly a waste of time. That's the applicable rule. Austin Powers, CPA, QPA, ERPA
Guest JMH1962 Posted February 16, 2012 Posted February 16, 2012 Thanks. That is what I am thinking. One has taken a position that the excludable class provision would only affect certain participants post amendment. Those who were already eligible and deferring would still be permitted to continue deferrals. P.S. This issue arose in a discussion relating to 410(b) Carve Out Plans.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now