Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I have a participant that is purchasing a lot (the loan documentation states that it is a "lot loan") and has requested a 401(k) hardship distribution for this. The lot happens to have two trailers (mobile homes) on it. One will be removed, and the other will become their principal residence. Is this a eligible reason for a 401(k) hardship distribution?

Posted

The reg says: "(2) Costs directly related to the purchase of a principal residence

for the employee (excluding mortgage payments);"

For a previous discussion on what might qualify as a principal residence, see these prior thread: http://benefitslink.com/boards/index.php?showtopic=38818

http://benefitslink.com/boards/index.php?showtopic=46172

My opinion is that yes, I'd allow it, but not for anything related to the removal of the other trailer.

Kurt Vonnegut: 'To be is to do'-Socrates 'To do is to be'-Jean-Paul Sartre 'Do be do be do'-Frank Sinatra

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use