Scuba 401 Posted April 19, 2012 Posted April 19, 2012 the plan uses the safe harbor definition of hardship. does construction of a principal residence equal purchase of a residence?
ETA Consulting LLC Posted April 19, 2012 Posted April 19, 2012 Of course it does. Good Luck! CPC, QPA, QKA, TGPC, ERPA
QDROphile Posted April 19, 2012 Posted April 19, 2012 The mechanics can be a lot more complex. The plan does not have to extend to the limit of wha the law allows.
Scuba 401 Posted April 20, 2012 Author Posted April 20, 2012 The mechanics can be a lot more complex. The plan does not have to extend to the limit of wha the law allows. i think the plan can deny this hardship request but still soliciting opinions here.
ACox Posted April 20, 2012 Posted April 20, 2012 Hardships can be allowed for costs directly related to purchase of a principal residence (excluding mortgage payments). To me a hardship to build a house would be considered a cost directly related to purchase of principal residence. Provided of course that the principal residence would be reasonably located and not 5 hours away at the beach.
RCK Posted April 24, 2012 Posted April 24, 2012 I agree with the consensus here that it constitutes a hardship. The challenge is how to apply your normal documentation rules--there is probably not going to a signed purchase agreement.
GMK Posted April 24, 2012 Posted April 24, 2012 If you permit the hardship distribution, consider an escrow, in case something falls through. See also: http://benefitslink.com/boards/index.php?showtopic=48405
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now