austin3515 Posted November 27, 2012 Posted November 27, 2012 We use Corbel PT 401k Plan. Have a plan that WAS 401k, but now wants to be PS only. My dillema is that for things like hardship and in-service, the PS Prototype doesn't give me the options regarding 401(k), etc.; it assumes the Plan has ALWAYS been PS only. So I don;t think it will work. So what am I to do? Should I use the 401k document still, but just not check the box that says 401(k) contributions will be allowed and "blank" the whole 401k section? I think that is what I need to do, but looking for suggestions. Austin Powers, CPA, QPA, ERPA
Bird Posted November 27, 2012 Posted November 27, 2012 Yes. I've used a 401(k) document for profit sharing only for various reasons. Ed Snyder
Kevin C Posted November 27, 2012 Posted November 27, 2012 If unchecking the deferrals allowed box prevents you from entering some of the provisions you need for existing accounts, you may be able to make it work by allowing deferrals / match, but limiting them to zero. I had to do that once when a client wanted to remove match provisions, but I still needed to be able to list the match vesting schedule for the old $.
John Feldt ERPA CPC QPA Posted November 27, 2012 Posted November 27, 2012 Have you tried submitting the question to SunGard to see what their document wizards can conjure up for you?
austin3515 Posted November 27, 2012 Author Posted November 27, 2012 I am awaiting their response Austin Powers, CPA, QPA, ERPA
austin3515 Posted November 28, 2012 Author Posted November 28, 2012 Sungard suggests using the 401k prototype w/ a 0% limit on 401k. They also recommended editing the SPD manually to make it not ridiculous. Austin Powers, CPA, QPA, ERPA
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now