Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

The question is too broad. Part of the answer is that an exclusion cannot be effective for those who have qualified for the contribution/accrual before the amendment, by accruing more than 1000 hours for example.

Posted

Agree that it is too broad, but most of the time I refer questions like this to the court case "North Shore Auto Body". Usually, this question is asked about excluding employees who have not yet met eligibility. And that answer to that is certainly yes (as long as the amendment is not discriminatory).

Posted

You can also make a class of employees ineligible for 401(k) contributions at any time. 401(k) eligibility is not a protected benefit.

QKA, QPA, CPC, ERPA

Two wrongs don't make a right, but three rights make a left.

Posted

The plan will be amended before any employee accrues sufficient hours to be entitled to a profit sharing accrual and, likely will cover HCE's as well as NHCE's.

Posted

but remember, even if such people are excluded from the plan, once they meet age 21/1 yr svc they are included and not beneifiting for coverage

and nondiscrim purposes (the non elective portion but not on ADP or ACP test)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use