Susan S. Posted July 3, 2013 Posted July 3, 2013 We are going to set up a couple of new SH 401k plans, most likely effective 8/1 or 9/1. I saw an old post suggesting that in this situation the effective date should be 1/1, with a separate effective date for deferrals and SH. I assume going this route there are no prorated limits. Is there any down side to doing it this way instead of having a short 1st plan year?
12AX7 Posted July 4, 2013 Posted July 4, 2013 I agree with your approach. Short plan/limitation years will prorate compensation and annual limitations of benefits. Also, depending on the plan document used, compensation for purposes of calculating the SH contribution may be limited to the period of the plan year that this provision is in effect...although this provision may be more applicable to a SHNEC than a SHMAC calculated on a per-payroll basis.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now