dmb Posted November 7, 2013 Posted November 7, 2013 Calendar Year Plan's service requirement for entry is 1 year of service. Entry date is defined as 1st day of month coincident or next following completion of eligibility requirement. Full time employee is hired on 1/2/13. Would the entry date be 1/1/14 or 2/1/14? Thanks.
BG5150 Posted November 7, 2013 Posted November 7, 2013 1/1. No doubt. It's coincident with the completion of the 1 year. QKA, QPA, CPC, ERPATwo wrongs don't make a right, but three rights make a left.
Tom Poje Posted November 7, 2013 Posted November 7, 2013 same exact question was on the Q and A at ASPPA this year. IRS response The service requirement is satisfied on 1/1; "coincident with" means the participant enters 1/1, if "next following" language is used, the participant enters the next entry date (4/1)
Calavera Posted November 7, 2013 Posted November 7, 2013 I red about it couple days ago in http://benefitsbryancave.com/what-a-difference-a-day-makes/ where it was emphasized that this answer was unofficial, and does not constitute a formal position of the IRS. Would you say that 1-year requirement was met on 00:01 of 1/2/14, therefore entering the plan 2/1/14?
GMK Posted November 7, 2013 Posted November 7, 2013 One way to view it is that each year has only one January 2nd. If you started on 1/2/13, then 1/2/14 starts your second year, which means that the first year ended before 1/2/14. So, the first year of service was completed on 1/1/14. You don't need any portion, not even one picosecond, of 1/2/14 to fulfill a year of service that started on 1/2/13. Of course, the part about "next following" or "coincident with" does make a difference for the participation date.
ESOP Guy Posted November 7, 2013 Posted November 7, 2013 I have seen it both ways and I understand the people who would argue the 1/1 date. As a counter I would point out no one says they turn 40 on the day before their birthday or are married 50 year on the day before their anniversary. So there is a convention that would point to the idea of your 1 year is up on the anniversary day. I think this is one of those areas where the plan administrator can make a judgement call (as all plans allow) and as long as they are consistant will not get called out on it.
wvbeachgirl Posted November 7, 2013 Posted November 7, 2013 When I first started in this business many years ago, my boss at the time explained it to me this way: If your date of hire is 1/1/13, when have you completed a Year of Service? Answer: 12/31/13. If the entry date is the 1/1 coinciding with or next following, then your entry date would be 1/1/14. So, when you're dealing with a hire date of 1/2/13, you would complete a Year of Service on 1/1/14, and the entry date coinciding with or next following is 1/1/14 (as GMK said, if your plan document provides "coinciding with"). Looking at it using the actual calendar year beginning and ending dates, and then just adding 1 day to both dates, helped clarify it for me!
BG5150 Posted November 7, 2013 Posted November 7, 2013 A year of service is a 12-month period. Not 12 months and a day. Maybe just don't hire people on the first of second of the month... QKA, QPA, CPC, ERPATwo wrongs don't make a right, but three rights make a left.
GMK Posted November 7, 2013 Posted November 7, 2013 no one says they turn 40 on the day before their birthday Social Security does http://www.ssa.gov/OP_Home/cfr20/404/404-0102.htm ESOP Guy 1
Tom Poje Posted November 8, 2013 Posted November 8, 2013 just for clarification, all Q and As will generally carry the caveat 'does not constitute a formal position of the IRS' that doesn't necessarily validate or invalidate the statement indicated. If, for instance, the plan was audited and questioned, I would point to the Q and A and say I was making a good faith effort. I would further add, as a general rule, such questions (unless they are from the floor) are submitted to the IRS personal weeks in advance, so it is not like a spur of the moment answer in most cases. (this is speaking from experience, as I used to sit on such discussions for a few years)
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now