R. Butler Posted February 5, 2014 Posted February 5, 2014 We just became tpa for Co. A's plan. Co. A is an S Corp. Person A is a 3% owner on 01/01/2013. On 09/01/2013 Person A becomes a 6% owner. The 2013 K-1 will show pro-rated ownership of 4.25% (or something right about there.) Prior tpa forwarded us the 2013 ADP/ACP test which has Person A as an NHCE. I spoke with plan sponsor about it. They are hoping to avoid refunds and want to assert that Person A is an NHCE for 2013 because the pro-rated ownership on the K-1 is less than 5%. Does anyone see any validiity to that assertion? I don't see it. It is my understanding that if an employee is a more than 5% owner at any point during the current plan that employee is considered an hce. I thought it would be worth a stab in the dark though to try to find a valid argument supporting the plan sponsor's "hoped for" result. Thanks in advance for any guidance.
Kevin C Posted February 5, 2014 Posted February 5, 2014 Your understanding is correct. 414(q)(2)5- percent owner.— An employee shall be treated as a 5-percent owner for any year if at any time during such year such employee was a 5-percent owner (as defined in section 416(i)(1)) of the employer.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now