Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I saw it as part of the IRS effort to locate non-filers. I'm sure they will process the new form with the same efficiency and accuracy they currently use for Form 5558.

Or, it could be part of the effort to keep the post office afloat.

Posted

Hilarious John, and very applicable.:

"Suppose you were an idiot, and suppose you were a member of Congress; but I repeat myself."

Austin Powers, CPA, QPA, ERPA

Posted

Hilarious John, and very applicable.:

"Suppose you were an idiot, and suppose you were a member of Congress; but I repeat myself."

Individually I suspect a lot of congress critters are reasonably smart. But when they get together I think their collective IQ drops by 30 points.

Posted

"I saw it as part of the IRS effort to locate non-filers. I'm sure they will process the new form with the same efficiency and accuracy they currently use for Form 5558."

I was just thinking about this. Am I the only one who sees a flaw in mandating the filing of an obscure tax form such as this as a means of finding people who have not filed a regular normal annual filing??

Austin Powers, CPA, QPA, ERPA

Posted

My cynical opinion is they want to knows whose home to raid and computers to seize.

What's annoying to me is the inconsistency between this (a change in responsible party) and a change in address. http://www.irs.gov/taxtopics/tc157.html Why don't they simply add a "responsible party" line to every relevant return and capture the change annually? (I know, I know, because the IRS never does anything "simply".)

Kurt Vonnegut: 'To be is to do'-Socrates 'To do is to be'-Jean-Paul Sartre 'Do be do be do'-Frank Sinatra

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use