Guest Celtics Posted March 27, 2014 Posted March 27, 2014 Company A with Plan A is a controlled group with Company B with Plan B. Neither company participates in the other plan. Both plans are 401ks with 3% safe harbors. Company A has 1 HCEE and 20 NHCEES. Company B has 1 HCEE and 300 NHCEES. The coverage ratio for the HCEES is 50% in both plans. Therefore, we need a coverage ratio for the NHCEES of 35% in both plans. Plan A would have 20/320 or 6.25%. Plan B would have 300/320 or 93.75%. Plan A would fail coverage. How do we correct? Thanks for your assistance.
Tom Poje Posted March 27, 2014 Posted March 27, 2014 since both plans have the same safe harbor is there a reason why coverage is not done on a permissive aggregation basis? (Unless they have different plan years is about the only reason I can think you can't) by the way, plan A would have NHCE ratio 20/320 and HCE ratio 1/2 so the ratio would be 12.5%, though that would still fail. but I still don't see why you don't combine for testing coverage.
MWeddell Posted March 31, 2014 Posted March 31, 2014 There might be BRFs in Plan A that are not present in Plan B, which would create a problem. That sounds like it may be less expensive to correct than a coverage test failure though.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now