52626 Posted May 23, 2014 Posted May 23, 2014 company A is purchasing Company B effective 6/1/2014 Company B's 401(k) Plan is to merge into Company A's 401(k) - however Company A sponsors a Safe Harbor Plan and Company B does not The merger will take place effective 1/1/2015 Question is what do with the deferrals from 6/1 - 12/31/2014 - Company A wants to live the plan as is until the end of 12/31/2014 and then merge the plans 1/1/2015. This will make the transition much easier for all. 1. Is it ok that effective 6/1/2014 the plan is amended to reflect Company A as the sponsor with their EIN and not jeopardize an of the transition rules? 2. Company A wants to amend the plan and state effective 1/1/2014 all participants in the Company B's plan are 100% vested. When the plans are merged there are a number of participants who terminated prior to 1/1/2014 that are partially vested. Any problem with using their non vested portion to offset fees once the forfeiture is triggered. Or do these employees also vest 100% as a result of the amendment. Thanks
MWeddell Posted May 27, 2014 Posted May 27, 2014 1. You will need to make sure the merger & acquisition transition rule does not end prematurely or perform and satisfy coverage testing for 2014. If you are relying on the m&a transition rule, then it is okay to amend Company B's 401(k) plan as long as the amendment is not a "significant change in the plan or in the coverage of the plan other than the acquisition or disposition." Treas. Reg. 1.410(b)-2(f). There is almost no elaboration in the regulations beyond the text I just quoted. I would think that amending the plan to reflect Company A as the sponsor is not a significant change, but that's just my opinion. I would think that changing the vesting schedule is a significant change and would prematurely end the m&a transition period. However, given that this is essentially a judgment issue, I would urge the client to consult with legal counsel. 2. There is no problem with that provided that the plan document after it is amended so provides.
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now