Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

ADP safe harbor contribution requirement is being satisfied through the 3% nonelective contribution. Plan also allows for ACP safe harbor match - fixed formula, $1-for-$1 up to first 3%, $.50-on-the-$1 on next 3%. Employer wants to amend the match formula to reduce the formula to just $1-for-$1 up to first 3%. The ACP safe harbor match is subject to a vesting schedule (not 100% vested).

It seems to me that this type of amendment is expressly allows under Treas. Reg. Section 1.401(m)-3(h), which provides that a Section 401(m)(11) safe harbor match may be reduced or amended during the Plan Year.

But, Sal's book states that an ACP safe harbor matching formula may not be modified during the plan year. This just seems to me to be contrary to the express language in the Treas. Reg.

Any thoughts, help on this is appreciated. Thanks.

Posted

The reg you cited does allow for the mid-year reduction or suspension of an ACP SH match. Without seeing the language in the EOB you are referring to, we can only guess about what Sal says. My guess is that he is saying that to be ACP safe harbor, the match formula can not be modified during the year. One of the conditions for being able to reduce or suspend an ACP SH match mid-year is that the plan amend to have the ACP test apply for the year -3(h)(1)(E).

Posted

A mid year change to the ACP Safe Harbor Match (not the ADP Safe Harbor Match). Well that is interesting because what if it was a discretionary contributions determined separately for each pay-period. Now there is no amendment. If on the contrary it was hard-coded into your document than an amendment would be required, and of course the IRS no-likey amendments to safe harbor plans.

I think most amendments are ok, but this one is a bit too close to the ACTUAL Safe Harbor Plan, so I would not do it. But again if the match was discretionary and calculated/determined each pay-period (and the document specifies each pay-period), then I think you should be ok. Just make sure you SH Notice either didn't mention the match directly, or that you left the door open to changing the match.

Austin Powers, CPA, QPA, ERPA

Posted

Scratch that... I just read the cited reg - I didn't realize there were parallel regs in 401k and 401m on this topic. Amend away, just make sure you follow all those rules including the ACP test...

Austin Powers, CPA, QPA, ERPA

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use