Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

What advantages do people see to having 65 for retirement age?

if you have 62 and 5 years, then vesting is almost the same.

If retirement age is 62, then you could force out termed Participants at age 62.

What are you all doing?

Posted

DBs and combo plans may want to use 65 sometimes. If the owner's going out at 65 anyway, using 65 means less cost for TH minimum benefits which are determined as of NRA.

And with combos, testing age often works better at 65. If we want the max 415 DB for the owner at 62 the DB will be at 62 but we may use 65 on the DC so the combo can be tested at 65, and we're fulfilling TH in the DC so that's not an issue. The minimum 0.5% benefit for 401(a)(26) is a tad more valuable at 62 than 65 but that (and passing with higher EBARs and MVARs) is the price of getting the owner the full 415 at 62.

I carry stuff uphill for others who get all the glory.

Posted

basically same as Sherpa pointed out, if plan is cross-tested and especially if combined with a DB plan then the extra 3 years in testing makes a big difference. In a stand alone DC plan and cross tested you are probably helped some at age 65 when you impute disparity is testing.

at age 65 the factor added to most NHCEs would be .65, but age age 62 is only .50

Posted

Cannot "force out" participants at NRA under a db plan. Cannot force a lump sum under a db plan if over $5,000. You must be thinking of some other kind of plan.

Always check with your actuary first!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

Terms of Use